The 2012 Supreme Court judgment in Suraj Lamp v State of Haryana held that:
Question 2 of 10
A PoA is executed on wrong stamp value (Rs. 100 instead of the required Rs. 5,000). Consequence?
Question 3 of 10
An attorney holds a PoA coupled with interest — she was appointed to recover a debt from a third party and keep the recovered sum in discharge of the principal's debt to her. The principal now attempts revocation. Under Section 202:
Question 4 of 10
A PoA specifies termination on 31 March 2027. On 15 March, the principal wants to revoke. Can he?
Question 5 of 10
Under Section 208, what protection does a third party who dealt with an attorney in good faith without notice of revocation have?
Question 6 of 10
A PoA to sell immovable property is executed. The attorney executes a sale deed in favour of a third party. After Suraj Lamp, ownership is effectively transferred by:
Question 7 of 10
A PoA is executed by a company in favour of its MD for signing a specific contract. Which is essential for validity?
Question 8 of 10
An NRI grants a GPA to his father to manage his affairs including selling property. GPA is silent on stamp duty. Executed in New York and apostilled but not registered. Father presents at Mumbai sub-registrar to sell a Mumbai property. Issues?
Question 9 of 10
A PoA is executed by a hospitalised principal who dies two days later before the attorney has acted. Status?